Philosophy

Proposed Philosophy of Stewardship

This proposal seeks to dispel the myth that the preservation of green space and the immediate needs of the community are at odds. Instead of maintaining this myth, we offer another suggestion: that communities need not choose between preserving their historic, cultural, environmental, and recreational resources and their needs for growth and improvement. The two are not, in many cases, mutually exclusive. 

Hence, this project suggests finding solutions for the superficial conflict between these interests. It asserts that it is possible to create a world that is livable and beautiful to live in. It insists on working with organizations, governments, communities, industry, and individuals to achieve this goal. 

Of course, this proposal stands against the destruction of vital resources and habitats for immediate, selfish goals--which don't take into account the future needs of anyone.  On the other hand, this proposal reminds us to be acutely aware that development and the extraction of resources are processes which we have to live with. We have to find solutions which do not destroy our future or our present. 

In order to achieve such goals, a non-judgmental attitude is essential. The New England Trail Proposal does not aim to tell anyone that they must have a greenway, it's here to say "You deserve a greenway. How can one be created for your community?" On the other hand, it is recognized that taking direct, proactive action when faced with the immediate destruction of a unique and vital habitat, resource, or landscape, is occasionally necessary. This proposal suggests open listening. It suggests the option of working together to find solutions. 

The methods suggested here vary: working with landowners to establish conservation easements and recreational right-of-ways; helping to assist in conservation purchases by identifying critical areas and common interest; finding solutions to taxing conflicts between development and conservation interests; asking people what they need, and listening; offering options rather than ultimatums. Activism is not excluded, when necessary, but it should be tempered with insight and consideration.